The Security Council is a bunch of tard

What kind of Security Council does the UN really need? One that concerns about the world or the one we have today. Really, I mean, look att that bunch of tard. We have the permanent members; the US, Great Britain, Russia, China and France.

One member starts war all over the world for its hunger for oil and power. It exports, not democracy, but its own view of capital punichment. "If a person is executed - then he must have been guilty - ey". The latest example of this twisted human value is how american marines attacked villagers in Iraq, executed women, children and men, and then claimed hard working conditions. Well, it must be freaking bad working conditions if it would let me go with murdering a whole village, wouldnt it? The next country is nought less than the first countrys batty boy. Hey, brits, everyone knows it. And you know that the rest of the world despise you for that fact. It must be a little bit awkward for a former empire to be tossed around like that by its former colony, am I right? Lets not even begin to mention all the crimes against minorities, democracy or international conventions the two following countries has comitted. I dont know how to stop. So, we have one country left. And, let me say, I will never trust a country that tests nuclear weapons at a safe distance on colonial ilands in the Pacific at the other side of the planet as a safelock for the world. Never!

So, just admit it. We are screwed with a tardy Security Council like the one we have hanging on our back today. And maybe, we really deserve them too.